Horde3D

Next-Generation Graphics Engine
It is currently 22.12.2024, 02:14

All times are UTC + 1 hour




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: SSAO
PostPosted: 22.08.2012, 21:48 
Offline

Joined: 17.01.2012, 04:56
Posts: 4
Hey all,
I decided to get:
http://www.gamedev.net/page/resources/_ ... ssao-r2753
Working in horde3d. It was quite fun and horde made it incredibly easy :D. Thanks guys for an awsome engine!! I figured I would share some code and results. I know there are/were a couple of ssao demos tutorials around, but I could not seem to find anything with a valid link sadly :(.

The ssao fragment shader:
Code:
#include "shaders/utilityLib/fragDeferredRead.glsl"

uniform sampler2D randomBuf; //A buffer to an image containing random directions.
uniform vec2 frameBufSize;
varying vec2 texCoords;

vec2 getRandom(vec2 coord)
{
  float randBufSize = 64.0;
  return normalize(texture2D(randomBuf, frameBufSize * coord / randBufSize).xy * 2.0 - 1.0);
}

float doAmbientOcclusion(vec2 tcoord, vec2 uv, vec3 p, vec3 cnorm)
{
  float g_scale = 5.5;
  float g_bias = .02;
  float g_intensity = 5.5;
  vec3 diff = getPos(tcoord+uv)-p;
  vec3 v = normalize(diff);
  float d = length(diff)*g_scale;
 
  return max(0.0, dot(cnorm, v)-g_bias)*(1.0/(1.0+d))*g_intensity;
}

void main( void )
{
  vec2 vec[8];
  vec[0] = vec2(1,0);
  vec[1] = vec2(-1,0);
  vec[2] = vec2(0,1);
  vec[3] = vec2(0,-1);
  vec[4] = vec2(.707, .707);
  vec[5] = vec2(-.707, .707);
  vec[6] = vec2(.707, -.707);
  vec[7] = vec2(-.707, -.707);

  vec3 p = getPos(texCoords);
  vec3 n = getNormal(texCoords);
  vec2 rand = getRandom(texCoords);

  float ao = 0.0;
  float rad = 0.25/p.z;

  int iterations = 4; //Larger this value the higher the quality.
  for (int j=0; j < iterations; ++j) {
    vec2 coord1 = reflect(vec[j], rand)*rad;
    vec2 coord2 = vec2(coord1.x*.707 - coord1.y*0.707,
                       coord1.x*.707 + coord1.y*.707);
    ao += doAmbientOcclusion(texCoords, coord1*.25, p, n);
    ao += doAmbientOcclusion(texCoords, coord1*.5, p, n);
    ao += doAmbientOcclusion(texCoords, coord1*.75, p, n);
    ao += doAmbientOcclusion(texCoords, coord1*1., p, n);
  }
  ao /= iterations*4.0;
  ao = 1-clamp(ao, 0, 1);
  gl_FragColor = vec4(ao, ao, ao, 1);
}


My blur step took place in two steps. One horizontal and one vertical.
Sample of the horizontal is bellow.
Code:
uniform sampler2D buf0;
uniform vec2 frameBufSize;
varying vec2 texCoords;

void main( void )
{
  float blur[7]; //This vector represents some blur distribution. The one bellow is made up.
  blur[0] = 1;
  blur[1] = 1;
  blur[2] = 2;
  blur[3] = 3;
  blur[4] = 2;
  blur[5] = 1;
  blur[6] = 1;
  float dev = 11.0;
  float width = 3.5;

  vec4 outCol = vec4(0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0);
  for (int i = 0; i < 7; ++i ) {
    outCol += texture2D(buf0, texCoords+vec2(width*(i-3), 0)/frameBufSize)/dev*blur[i];
  }
  gl_FragColor = outCol;
}


Results:
My first tests where with a full size ssao buffer. On my computer this was quite slow.
Attachment:
File comment: Full size buffer with no blur
highssao.jpg
highssao.jpg [ 188.37 KiB | Viewed 11116 times ]


I found that scaling the buffer down to .25 of the original size then bluring like crazy gave fairly fast speeds.
Attachment:
File comment: .25 size buffer. With blur.
ssaolow.jpg
ssaolow.jpg [ 81.96 KiB | Viewed 11116 times ]

And when multiplied with the actual render
Attachment:
File comment: .25 size buffer with blur multiplied by actual render.
lowComp.jpg
lowComp.jpg [ 97.88 KiB | Viewed 11116 times ]


Some questions I still have is how to improve performance: What causes it to be slow? Is it mostly just the texture2D calls per pixel?

Currently all the source for the shader is at: https://github.com/lukemetz/Azurite/blo ... sao.shader
The pipeline is at https://github.com/lukemetz/Azurite/blo ... peline.xml
This is a personal project, just for fun... So the source can be messy in places, such as not removing constants from the .shader file :P.

Thanks for reading,
Hope this might come in handy to somebody. Feel free to post questions bellow if needed.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: SSAO
PostPosted: 23.08.2012, 14:30 
Offline

Joined: 23.07.2009, 21:03
Posts: 51
Location: Germany
Very nice.
I gave it a small test run using the sponza model:

Image
Image
Image

Thanks for sharing!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2 posts ] 

All times are UTC + 1 hour


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group